I have lived through many of the changes that have occurred to the different generations. In fact I have two children born in the in generation X, and two born in the millennial generation. What I come to realize is that each one of them are unique in their own way. I have never thought of my children as generations X or millennial but as having their own particular characteristic which my husband myself tried to develop and bring to it full potential. It's not always easy to raise children and it certainly has to be a challenge to teach a group of children from all types of backgrounds.
I don't like to stereotype-it seems to me that is what the Prensky's article does. I was born the later part of what is known as the silent generation and I have seen some good things happen and not so good things. Technology has advanced so much that it seem that it is limitless. But if we start kindergartners off using computers and not teach them how to write their name, know their home address and use their brain to make wise decisions, what happens? I have talked to my brother and I wanted to know why he had not called. " I lost my phone, he said, and your phone number was in it. I don't even know your phone number." He is a baby boomer. My point is that generations can be grouped into these stereotypes but that does not make it a true fact. There is nothing wrong with using computers or being good at using them, but there should be a balance where that is not the only tool we use.
Parents can do a lot to controlling that. One of the excuses I hear from parents as to why their children have cell phone in school is that in case of an emergency. That is a good reason, but when you are in a classroom, therefore teachers should not have to tell students to put there phones away during class. If emergencies occur the teacher should have things under control. Everyone should not have their cell phone out taking pictures--that can add to the problem.
You can find rude people in every generation. You can also find pragmatic, polite, and all the other stereotypes listed in literature. I also recognized that there needs to be change in how we engage learners. As teacher getting to know your students is important. I also understand that there are times when class size is too large to obtain that goal. I hope that online teaching will help teacher have a blended learning atmosphere where students that need that extra attention can get it and those that can work independently can also thrive.
I like face to face conversations myself. I sometimes have trouble with online conversations. I'm hoping that this class will help me become more comfortable in this situation I feel like a "Digital Immigrant.
I like that you mentioned Kindergarteners and technology. What you described is exactly what is going on in my school. These young babies hardly know how to write their names and have no idea what their address is but we are shoving technology down their throats because they "need to test on it"...and I'm saying this being their technology teacher! It's quite interesting that some things that used to be considered priorities in education have moved to the back burner.
ReplyDeleteOn a side note, I read your introduction, I am also currently pursuing my online teaching certificate! Last class! Good luck to you!
I too am pursuing my online teaching degree.☺ Given the times that we are living in and the advancements towards technology it only seems appropriate to have younger students engaged with multitudes of technology. Signatures, apps that read to you and write for you, etc. have been put in place to prevent the need for students to learn in the manner that they did in my generation. I know that this is hard to digest for some people, but times are changing and we have to transform from Digital Immigrants to Digital Natives.
DeleteGreat post Sandra! You listed a key term that stood out to me throughout Prensky's article (mainly because he was so one-sided with his arguments)---stereotypes. I think had his arguments not been so one-sided, his statements wouldn't seem as stereotypical and would appear more like typical generational attributes (like some of the other articles that we read) rather than an ethnocentric opinion.
ReplyDeleteI also could identify with what you mentioned (and Victoria second as a teacher) about students not acquiring basic skills because of some technological advancements. I've noticed this with my own children. My 8 year old's hand coordination is not up to par. His handwriting is awful and both of my kids constantly complain anytime they have to "write" for long periods of time. "My hand hurts....." yet their fingers never hurt from computer use or going to town on their iPads...So while they are most definitely advanced in many areas of technology (my 7 year old is doing robotic coding), their penmanship is awful and it seems like they're delayed in some of the more traditional tasks from when I was their age.
There were many different points that you stated that I found to be interesting. I to have never classified my children as generation this or that or millenials or anything of that nature. They are my babies and like you they are eccentric and unoqur in their own manner. I don't like stereotyping either and believe that every student;like my children are eccentric and unique. Though I did not get that from the Prensky article. I felt that he was merely speaking about the generation and times that he was currently living in, and to be quite honest teachers were treating students like robots. Their only purpose was to feed them information and the student digest it. No thought process involved.
ReplyDeleteI do agree that students do not need cell phones in the classroom, unless it is required for the assignment. I also agree that technology has benecits in any situation, yet we all know too uch of something is a bad thing. I believe that is the case in some situations.I also agree face to face is crucial in this day and time where it has become inadvertently easy to hide behind a screen.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteWhat a blessing. Your children are spread across generations. What a blessing.
ReplyDeleteIn your first paragraoh,you let us know, that the rearing of your children was important to you. You speak of them as "individuals" and your desire for them to live up to their "full potential." As a mother of 7 children (bonus and biological), I'd love for you to share what you see as "full potential" and what strategies do you have for mothers who desire the same for their children?
Although I'm pretty excited about this "technology"thing, I agree with you on several comments that I would call "old school". You suggest that there would be no cell phones in the classroom, if parents would just PARENT! You'd rather not stereotypes attached to individuals, and I "get" that too. I don't care how "new-fangled" we become in this life, immigrant or not, some practices "just make sense."
Vickie's comment speaks to one of the central issues facing teachers: we're being measured on our effectiveness when the thing we're rated on (students) only spend a fraction of the day under our care.
ReplyDeleteFurther, per Sam's comment about 'feeding them information', this also boils down to a flawed accountability system. We're rewarded for test scores, the test mostly focuses on facts, thus, we teach facts.